UFCD Funding Opportunities
The primary purpose of the UFCD Seed Grant Program is to provide short-term support to collect sufficient preliminary data to submit a competitive application to the NIH, including K, R, P, U or other types of awards, or to other organizations that utilize rigorous peer review as part of their award process. The primary goal of this grant program is to enhance extramurally-funded interdisciplinary research conducted in the college. Research projects may be hypothesis-driven or alternatively may entail a proof of concept. In both cases, it is anticipated that preliminary data derived from a seed grant award will significantly strengthen a future application for extramural funding.
The primary objective of the Seed Grant Program for UFCD Students is to promote independent student research by providing short-term support for novel research projects. Towards this goal, the application process itself is intended, in part, to help foster students to develop and clearly delineate the reasoning and approaches of a project, under the advisement of their mentor(s).
The primary objective of the UFCD Transition to Scientific Independence Award (TSIA) is to support independent research projects spearheaded by post-doctoral associates and fellows that can lead to preliminary data that will enhance the likelihood of the individual to secure K or R awards from the NIH, or similar awards from other agencies/foundations. The TSIA may not be used to supplement currently funded research projects of the applicant’s mentor(s). Thus, whereas techniques, patient populations, and other aspects of the TSIA may coincide or overlap with those of the mentor’s research program, the hypothesis to be tested and aim(s) of the TSIA project must be unique.
The College of Dentistry supports a Bridge Funding Program to provide research funds for UFCD investigators whose federal peer-reviewed competitive renewal research applications were not funded, although they received either excellent priority scores or very positive comments from reviewers in the Summary Statement. The revised and resubmitted proposals must be predicted to have a high probability of funding after appropriate revision and resubmission.
Other Student Resources